Registered Member #313
Joined Wed Jul 06 2005, 08:52AM
posts 2
Hello, everyone
I want to calculate GaMnAs system. I want to use PAW_GGA pseudopotential. First, I want to validate PAW_GGA pseudopotential. I calculate bulk GaAs using Ga and As potpaw_GGA. I get that bulk GaAs lattice constant is about 5.76 angstrom, but 5.65 in experiment. Is the LDA resulted? Next, I use Ga and As PAW pseudopotential. I get that bulk GaAs lattice constant is about 5.64 that is very near exmperimental value. Is the PAW_GGA something wrong? Any replies and explains are appreciated. Thanks
Best regard.
zzzhong
Below is my input file
INCAR
general:
System = Zinc Blende GaAS
ISTART = 0 ; ICHARG=2
PREC=HIGH
ISMEAR = 0; SIGMA = 0.001;
ALGO= V
GGA=91
VOSKOWN=1
POTCAR
PAW Ga
3.00000000000000000
parameters from PSCTR are:
VRHFIN =Ga: s2p1
LEXCH = 91
EATOM = 59.0602 eV, 4.3408 Ry
TITEL = PAW Ga
LULTRA = F use ultrasoft PP ?
IUNSCR = 1 unscreen: 0-lin 1-nonlin 2-no
RPACOR = 2.170 partial core radius
POMASS = 69.723; ZVAL = 3.000 mass and valenz
RCORE = 2.600 outmost cutoff radius
RWIGS = 2.650; RWIGS = 1.402 wigner-seitz radius (au A)
ENMAX = 134.733; ENMIN = 101.050 eV
ICORE = 3 local potential
LCOR = T correct aug charges
LPAW = T paw PP
EAUG = 320.264
DEXC = -.088
RMAX = 3.972 core radius for proj-oper
RAUG = 1.300 factor for augmentation sphere
RDEP = 2.684 radius for radial grids
QCUT = -3.147; QGAM = 6.294 optimization parameters
Registered Member #5
Joined: Tue Aug 31 2004, 07:30AM
posts 5
GGA potentials tend to over-estimate the lattice costant a little bit
sometimes, but 1.7% seems rather large
Please check if your single steps were electronically converged (EDIFF ) .