### Error in TS\IH dispersion correction calculations

Posted:

**Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:01 am**Dear VASP users and/or developpers,

I recently encountered multiple errors using the Tkatchenko-Scheffler method with iterative Hirshfeld partitioning (TS\HI, IVDW = 21), which seem to be very much related to the initial geometries of my system. Specifically, I used crystal-structure prediction calculations (with VASP v5.4.1 for the structure relaxations) in the LaOCuS system and then faced for a number of structures a problem that appears to be related to the iterative Hirshfeld partitionning procedure. Note that I only include the IVDW = 21 tag after a first step in which a crude optimization with fixed cell volume is performed. When I include the TS\HI correction, in a second step of the geometry relaxation, the first electronic minimization converges succesfully, but then the calculation stops in the middle of the TS\HI calculation procedure. The error file ends with the following lines :

******************** ERROR file *********************

Hirshfeld-I algorithm:

translations: 2 2 1

SUBROUTINE COMPENSATION_WATSON: ERROR1, unable to reach convergence in 1000 cycles.

(written once per processor)

********************************************************

The POSCAR and INCAR files of a representative example of this problem are given below :

******************** POSCAR **********************

La2O2Cu2S2 - structure generated by a "symmetric random" algorithm within USPEX

1.0000

4.947281 -0.120366 -0.541741

-2.032031 4.004683 0.009609

-0.314816 0.033545 7.542765

La O Cu S

2 2 2 2

Direct

0.345819 0.662108 0.123361

0.663701 0.343225 0.106892

0.996173 0.979656 0.977840

0.974999 0.987101 0.547130

0.989501 0.991909 0.779362

0.992996 0.989935 0.232638

0.325775 0.645705 0.718672

0.662507 0.342007 0.728175

******************** INCAR **********************

SYSTEM = La2O2Cu2S2, variable-cell-fixed-volume optimization, close to minimum

LREAL = .FALSE.

PREC = Normal

IVDW = 21

VDW_C6AU = 800 15.60 253.0 134.0

VDW_R0AU = 4.8 3.194 3.761 3.855

VDW_ALPHA = 74.6 5.40 42.0 19.6

ENCUT = 400

EDIFF = 1e-3

EDIFFG = 1e-2

IBRION = 1

ISIF = 4

NSW = 100

ISMEAR = 1 ; SIGMA = 0.14

POTIM = 0.20

LCHARG = FALSE

LWAVE = FALSE

NCORE=4

SYMPREC = 1e-3

*******************************************************

Increasing HITOLER up to 5e-2 does not solve the problem. I also tried to play with the PREC parameter (setting it to Accurate instead of Normal) and the number of k-points, but without any effect.

Can someone help me understand what is going wrong with the TS\IH correction in this case and how I can possibly solve the problem ?

Thank you very much.

Best regards.

Sylvian.

I recently encountered multiple errors using the Tkatchenko-Scheffler method with iterative Hirshfeld partitioning (TS\HI, IVDW = 21), which seem to be very much related to the initial geometries of my system. Specifically, I used crystal-structure prediction calculations (with VASP v5.4.1 for the structure relaxations) in the LaOCuS system and then faced for a number of structures a problem that appears to be related to the iterative Hirshfeld partitionning procedure. Note that I only include the IVDW = 21 tag after a first step in which a crude optimization with fixed cell volume is performed. When I include the TS\HI correction, in a second step of the geometry relaxation, the first electronic minimization converges succesfully, but then the calculation stops in the middle of the TS\HI calculation procedure. The error file ends with the following lines :

******************** ERROR file *********************

Hirshfeld-I algorithm:

translations: 2 2 1

SUBROUTINE COMPENSATION_WATSON: ERROR1, unable to reach convergence in 1000 cycles.

(written once per processor)

********************************************************

The POSCAR and INCAR files of a representative example of this problem are given below :

******************** POSCAR **********************

La2O2Cu2S2 - structure generated by a "symmetric random" algorithm within USPEX

1.0000

4.947281 -0.120366 -0.541741

-2.032031 4.004683 0.009609

-0.314816 0.033545 7.542765

La O Cu S

2 2 2 2

Direct

0.345819 0.662108 0.123361

0.663701 0.343225 0.106892

0.996173 0.979656 0.977840

0.974999 0.987101 0.547130

0.989501 0.991909 0.779362

0.992996 0.989935 0.232638

0.325775 0.645705 0.718672

0.662507 0.342007 0.728175

******************** INCAR **********************

SYSTEM = La2O2Cu2S2, variable-cell-fixed-volume optimization, close to minimum

LREAL = .FALSE.

PREC = Normal

IVDW = 21

VDW_C6AU = 800 15.60 253.0 134.0

VDW_R0AU = 4.8 3.194 3.761 3.855

VDW_ALPHA = 74.6 5.40 42.0 19.6

ENCUT = 400

EDIFF = 1e-3

EDIFFG = 1e-2

IBRION = 1

ISIF = 4

NSW = 100

ISMEAR = 1 ; SIGMA = 0.14

POTIM = 0.20

LCHARG = FALSE

LWAVE = FALSE

NCORE=4

SYMPREC = 1e-3

*******************************************************

Increasing HITOLER up to 5e-2 does not solve the problem. I also tried to play with the PREC parameter (setting it to Accurate instead of Normal) and the number of k-points, but without any effect.

Can someone help me understand what is going wrong with the TS\IH correction in this case and how I can possibly solve the problem ?

Thank you very much.

Best regards.

Sylvian.